In Denmark, we have a very brave politician. She is a women named Birthe Rønn Hornbech. She belongs to the right wing of the government, and is the minister for integration and the Church of Denmark. An unusual cocktail of ministries, I know, but this was how the government preferred it to be. Even though the government is very much against head scarfs and other symbols that have anything to do with Islam, this brave woman last week wrote a very clever and interesting article in a Danish newspaper. The case was, that a lot of politicians on the right wing wants to ban head scarfs from the Danish Court rooms, so that no judge should be allowed to wear one. Birthe Rønn argued, against the government and her party, that it would not be wise with such a ban. She argued, that no judge should be forced to wear any symbols, and therefore not be baned from searing them either. Any such ban would be bad for the impartiality of the court room. The union of Danish Judges agreed with Birthe Rønn Hornbech, since they could not see how any such ban would support the court, and keep it free from religious prejudices. As one of the Danish judges argued: 'It takes at least 15 years for a person to go through the juridical system, before he or she will be choosed as a judge. Any person who has shown any sign of religious extremism would no be chosen anyway. A Muslim women who has been through this process, and has been chosen, would obviously not be an extremist, whether she wears the veil or not'
Today, Birthe Rønn Hornbech's own party, Venstre, has ordered her not to speak in public about head scarfs at all. The government will soon vote on a ban on head scarfs and other 'religious symbols' in Danish Court Rooms. -From now on, I can only talk about my own silk scarfs, Birthe Rønn Hornbech said today, after a meeting with her party, Venstre.
The Danish Government is voting on the ban later this week.
Archives
- May 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (1)
- more...
Last comments
- Vikingwomen on: The Land of Xenophobia
- French Catholic in DK on: The Land of Xenophobia
- Vikingwomen on: Birthe Rønn Hornbech: A Brave Danish Politician
- technomist on: Birthe Rønn Hornbech: A Brave Danish Politician
- Vikingwomen on: Birthe Rønn Hornbech: A Brave Danish Politician
- Vikingwomen on: The Land of Xenophobia
- ukcruiseguy pro on: The Land of Xenophobia
- technomist on: The Land of Xenophobia
- prydwen on: The Land of Xenophobia
- Show more
Calendar
| Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa | Su |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Search
Birthe Rønn Hornbech: A Brave Danish Politician
Trackback address for this post:
Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments
This is Birthe Rønn Hornbechs emailaddress, by the way: min@inm.dk
| technomist [Member] 2008-05-20 @ 23:43 |
The argument that because it takes a person 15 years before he or she will be chosen as a judge any sign of religious extremism would have been noticed and cause them not to be be chosen anyway is fallacious. There were any number of judges in Europe with character falws that bring them and the legal system into disrepute and there are any number of Christian and other types of bigots on the bench now all over Europe who were been appointed after undergoing years of training and rigorous selection processes. The question is: who is choosing , what are the criteria they apply, and, of those criteria, which do they give most weight to.
Another point: The idea that judges should not be forced to wear any symbols, does not have as its logical consequence that Judges therefore should not be banned from wearing them either.
2008-05-21 @ 09:22
The fact that it takes 15 years to become a judge in Denmark does make a difference. It is 15 years where the person will have to prove that he or she has got what it takes to be the person in charge of the court case. In Denmark anybody with the marks can get into law school. Unlike many other countries, it is not just those who can afford it, and have a large family tradition of lawyers who will get a place there. You have to be clever enough; thats all! I would therefore like to argue, that the juridical system in Denmark is a lot more impartial than in some other European countries. There could, of course, be broken barrels somewhere, but in general, the Danish system is extremely efficient and free of any kind of corruption.
A ban on religious symbols in the court room is in reality a ban on head scarfs. Other religious symbols have somehow never been an issue in Denmark before. It is therefore also a way of saying, that a larger group of Muslim women should not be allowed as judges in a Danish court room.
I believe, that if the Danish politicians really wants to prove the 'impartiality' of the judges, they should rather consider introducing the wigs that are being used in courts in England and Wales. Or how about head scarfs to all female judges?
Leave a comment :
Recent Posts
-
The Land of Xenophobia
on 2008-03-22




2008-05-20 @ 17:11